Grounding, Quantifiers, and Paradoxes
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract The notion of grounding is usually conceived as an objective and explanatory relation. It connects two relata if one—the ground—determines or explains the other—the consequence. In contemporary literature on grounding, much effort has been devoted to logically characterize formal aspects but a major hard problem remains: defining suitable principles for universal existential formulae. Indeed, several quantified formulae have proposed, all them are exposed paradoxes in some very natural contexts application. We introduce this paper first-order system that captures avoids novel non-trivial way. we present formally develops Bolzano’s ideas by employing Hilbert’s ε -terms adapted version Fine’s theory arbitrary objects.
منابع مشابه
Grounding natural language quantifiers in visual attention
The literature on vague quantifiers in English (words like “some”, “many”, etc.) is replete with demonstrations of context effects. Yet little attention has been paid to the issue of where such effects come from. We explore the possibility that such they emanate from a visual attentional bottleneck which limits the accuracy of judgments of number in visual scenes under conditions of time pressu...
متن کاملGrounding Linguistic Quantifiers in Perception: Experiments on Numerosity Judgments
The paper presents a new computational model for the grounding of numerosity judgments and of the use of linguistic quantifiers. The model consists of a hybrid, artificial vision-connectionist architecture. Preliminary simulation experiments show that the part of the model trained to judge “psychological number” uses some of the same factors known to play a major role in the production of quant...
متن کاملQuantifiers ∗
Quantifiers are terms of generality. They are also among our prime examples of operators which take scope. The distinction between singular and general terms, as well as the ways that general terms enter into scope relations, are certainly fundamental to our understanding of language. Yet when we turn to natural language, we encounter a huge and apparently messy collection of general terms; not...
متن کاملChildren's interpretations of general quantifiers, specific quantifiers, and generics.
Recently, several scholars have hypothesized that generics are a default mode of generalization, and thus that young children may at first treat quantifiers as if they were generic in meaning. To address this issue, the present experiment provides the first in-depth, controlled examination of the interpretation of generics compared to both general quantifiers ("all Xs", "some Xs") and specific ...
متن کاملGeometry, Voting, and Paradoxes
What could be easier than “voting?” After all, to vote we just count how many people favor each candidate. What can go wrong with something so elementary as this? Actually, a lot. As mathematicians and others have shown over the last two centuries, once there are at least three candidates—not an atypical situation—the winner need not be whom the voters really want. Such bad outcomes may occur n...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Philosophical Logic
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1573-0433', '0022-3611']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09604-w